Course Objectives: This discussion addresses CO-5 (Microsoft PowerPoint Presentations)
🎯 The Setup
You just completed an intensive week learning PowerPoint — from slide fundamentals to multimedia integration and design best practices. You know the CARP principles, the 6x6 rule, and how to make a presentation that actually communicates instead of confuses.
Now it is time to put that knowledge to work by critically analyzing the good, the bad, and the ugly of real presentations.
💀
Death by PowerPoint
Walls of text, clip art chaos, no visual hierarchy
VS
✨
Presentation Perfection
Clean design, purposeful visuals, engaged audience
Quick Reference: CARP Design Principles
C
Contrast
Make different elements look distinctly different to guide the viewer's eye.
A
Alignment
Every element should connect visually to something else on the page.
R
Repetition
Repeat visual elements (colors, fonts, shapes) for consistency and unity.
P
Proximity
Group related items together; separate unrelated items with space.
✍️ Your Three-Part Discussion Prompt
Part 1 — The Bad
Describe the worst presentation you have ever seen (or given!). What went wrong? Think about the CARP design principles and the 6x6 rule. Which of these principles were violated?
Part 2 — The Good
Now describe the best presentation you have experienced. What made it effective? How did the presenter use visuals, design, and delivery to keep you engaged?
Part 3 — Your Turn
You have been asked to create a 10-minute patient education presentation about managing Type 2 Diabetes for a diverse patient population. Describe THREE design decisions you would make and explain WHY each would improve patient understanding.
Patient education presentations are used in clinics, hospitals, and community health events. Your audience might include elderly patients, non-English speakers, people with low health literacy, and stressed family members. Good design is not just aesthetic — it is a patient safety issue.
✅ What You Need to Do
-
☐
Part 1: Describe a bad presentation and identify which CARP principles or 6x6 rule were violated.
-
☐
Part 2: Describe a great presentation and explain what made it effective.
-
☐
Part 3: Design 3 specific decisions for a Type 2 Diabetes patient education presentation with rationale.
-
☐
Write 200+ words total, applying CARP principles and the 6x6 rule by name.
-
☐
Reply to 2 classmates — 75+ words each. Challenge, build on, or compare their design decisions.
Initial Post Due
Wednesday
11:59 PM
Replies Due
Sunday
11:59 PM
📊 Grading Rubric
| Criteria |
Points |
| Bad presentation analysis with specific CARP/6x6 violations identified |
20 pts |
| Good presentation analysis with explanation of what made it effective |
15 pts |
| Three design decisions for diabetes presentation with clear rationale |
15 pts |
| Two substantive replies (75+ words each) that advance the discussion |
10 pts |
| Total |
60 pts |
- Be honest! Some of the best posts come from people admitting their own "death by PowerPoint" moments.
- Use the design vocabulary from class: contrast, alignment, repetition, proximity, 6x6 rule, white space, visual hierarchy.
- For Part 3, think about your specific audience. What font size works for elderly patients? What colors communicate trust vs. urgency?
- Consider cultural sensitivity — images and colors carry different meanings in different cultures.
- In your replies, suggest alternative design decisions. "Have you considered using infographics instead of bullet points for the dietary section?"
"Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works."
— Steve Jobs